Quantcast
Channel: Marketing – Wharton Magazine
Viewing all 141 articles
Browse latest View live

Content Marketing Is Conquering Your Customers

$
0
0
The best social marketing turns corporations into trusted friends for consumers. But are companies ready to ditch immediate returns for “youtility”? Penn alumna Lisa Niver thinks not.We are now all in the marketing business. As Jay Baer has pointed out in his book, Youtility: Why Smart Marketing Is about Help Not Hype, “content is fire and social media is gasoline!” Baer says, “Success flows to organizations that inform, not organizations that promote.” Many companies’ knee-jerk reaction has been to promote how great they are and do little else but repeat platitudes about their own company without regard to engaging their community. After working with over 700 companies, Baer knows what works. He describes “friend-of-mine awareness” as one strategy that makes a company stand out.175563453-(1) “If you are useful without engaging in an immediate quid pro quo, your business will be trusted the same way consumers trust their friends and family members,” Baer writes. The new magic is to “focus on solving problems, answering questions and creating long-lasting customer relationships by doing so.” Companies that figure this out will be rewarded with all types of success. Friend-of-mine awareness is based on the reality that companies “are competing against real people for the attention of other real people.” When consumers trust a company as they would a person, the reward is that customers and prospects then will do more of its marketing for the company. I was astounded by an example in Youtility about the Twitter feed @HiltonSuggests. I started following it and Vanessa Sain-Dieguez, director of social media planning and integration for Hilton Worldwide, on Twitter. Hilton has taken the idea of being a friend to a whole new level by sharing local knowledge with anyone in a city where the hospitality company has a local team member online. My first thought was to share this with a family about to go to Prague, one of the 25 pilot cities for the program. I love San-Dieguez’s quote in the book about how some of the experts are not from concierge or social media but “they’re just hotel employees who love their city and want to help visitors better enjoy it.” “We’re not looking to win your stay on this trip. We’re looking to make a real, authentic connection with you and hopefully gain a customer for life,” says Sain-Dieguez. I love that they are building friend-of-mine awareness and understand that the new ROI (return on investment) is a return on involvement. Is your company ready for youtility? Many companies are not. Offering assistance without expecting immediate return “is in direct opposition to the principles of marketing and business deeply ingrained in practitioners at all levels,” writes Baer. This was a major issue with several hotels when I organized a speaking tour called the “Festival of the Pacific.” Many hotels have asked me about how they can grow their followings and show up better in searches, yet most of them are not ready to shift to the new ROI (involvement). I was surprised when one major chain declined to host a speaking event but did host me for two nights in a suite with ocean views in Oahu. Hotels customarily host writers—but not events. The hotel that chose to host the event had over 40 people show up who loved the hotel, the restaurant and the event, and the hotel was able to introduce these guests to its latest Thursday night happy hour promotion. I got to stay in the penthouse as well (where the Black Eyed Peas stayed when in town for a concert!). The social media buzz on the event was such that the general manager asked when I could fly back and give another talk. I wrote an article for the first hotel, but it failed to generate the interest produced by the talk and the subsequent video. When you resort to traditional promotion and stay away from providing information, that bond of trust with consumers “evaporates,” as Baer puts it. Another example from Baer’s book is Holiday World and Splashin’ Safari, which offer their guests free parking, refreshments and sunscreen. “[It] is creating more waves as that is the conscientious treatment your friend would give you at their house,” Baer writes. People want to feel like they belong in your community. They want to feel like they matter and that a company is treating them as relevant. Customers and prospects are responding to the youtility trend. As Baer explains, 60 percent of consumer decisions are made before a company even has a consumer on its radar. “Customers are ninjas now. They are stealthily evaluating you right under your nose,” Baer writes. So, what are you doing to make a difference for your tribe?    

FANAFI: Why Entrepreneurs Should Find a Need and Fill It!

$
0
0
Discovering problems that lead to consumer needs is a sure way for entrepreneurs to start a business, as marketing veteran Bob Natiello learned soon after Wharton. In search of a consumer need worthy of a startup More than 50 years have passed since Corning Inc. launched CorningWare in 1958, its most important consumer product since the 1915 introduction of Pyrex brand bakeware. With pre-World War I homemakers marveling at the concept of baking their cakes in clear glass, Corning believed that 1960s housewives were sure to spark to its newest ceramic advance. Imagine being able to fry in a beautiful opaque dish placed directly on an open flame. Made of space-age Pyroceram, CorningWare astonished saucer-eyed housewives with its ability to move directly from freezer to flame without cracking because of extreme temperature changes. At the end of this shocking journey, CorningWare could be conveniently brought, in all its appealing whiteness, directly to any formal table setting. Corning’s veteran marketing director assigned me, a newly arrived Wharton MBA, to accompany him on the test-marketing phase. Left on my own, I immediately set off to prepare all the materials. I checked off dozens of items—audio-visuals, easels, fact sheets—everything needed for our introductory meetings with department-store buyers and housewares distributors. With only one week remaining before our departure for the New England test area, I sat him down for a run-through and tightened my buttocks while awaiting his response. His appraisal of my efforts came as a surprise. “For years, my father has been deeply supportive of the Boy Scouts of America,” he began. “Every Christmas he sends the same card. It features a Boy Scout on the cover.” Where he was he headed, I had no idea. “The words inside never change,” he continued. “They say, ‘Find a need and fill it.’ ” I relaxed when he added, “That’s exactly what you’ve done here. You’ve filled our need for organization.” I’ve carried those words with me for a lifetime and have tried to instill them in my children and co-workers. They originated with Ruth Stafford Peale, wife of the Rev. Norman Vincent Peale, author of The Power of Positive Thinking. Whether in the form of an acronym—FANAFI!—or in their unassailable six-word counsel, they clearly demand positive action. First, find! Next, fill! [caption id="attachment_26046" align="alignright" width="281"]Ruth Stafford Peale, wife of the Rev. Norman Vincent Peale, who coined the phrase, "Find a need and fill it." Ruth Stafford Peale, wife of the Rev. Norman Vincent Peale, who coined the phrase, "Find a need and fill it." Photo credit: National Council of Churches.[/caption] Of the two commands, finding the unfilled need may offer the harder challenge for Wharton entrepreneurs. After Corning, I started using a technique called “problem detection,” a marketing research method developed to uncover consumer needs for General Electric, my ad agency’s client. Identify a problem, the theory went, and you’ve taken the first step toward finding a need. Sometimes the problem we discovered was tangible—dials too large for a woman’s hand. Sometimes the problem was intangible—difficulty in cleaning. Other times the problem was latent—consumers didn’t know they had the problem until they were offered a solution. It was a latent problem that brought out the need for the GE smoke detector. Research showed that people had a serious fear of a home fire breaking out at night. But the problem lay hidden until they saw a solution in the form of an affordable smoke- detecting device. Discovering a problem that leads to a consumer need is a sure way for an entrepreneur to start a business. When, like the smoke detector, the problem is serious and frequent, the chances for success increase substantially. And if another marketer isn’t currently filling the need, well, Wharton entrepreneurs have a business on their hands.    

Why a Successful Marketing Strategy Needs the CIO

$
0
0
For marketing execs, cultivating the chief information officer is an absolute must in this data-intensive age. David T. Scott offers five ways to do it right.Chief marketing officers are naturally very friendly and outgoing, so we tend to have a lot of friends. No, really, it’s a known fact. The thing is, we can have all the friends we want, but are they the right ones? Just like in our personal lives, there are some relationships in the business world that are worth courting more than others—ones that “complete” us as business professionals. As CMOs, we just might be overlooking the one person who, today, could be the most critical to our success—the chief information officer. Yes, the CIO—the quiet yet insightful person who sits in the dark corners of the data center staring at lines of code and who is good at fixing computers. Years ago, we might not have thought so, but today this just might be the match we’ve all been pining for. I’m not saying to send flowers and chocolates. But now that technology and data are crucial components of the business process, this relationship is becoming more important than ever. Much like marketing agencies did decades previously, internal IT departments over the past few years have taken on a prominent role in the success of marketing organizations, and rightfully so. As marketers in particular, with marketing automation, real-time bidding engines for display advertising and social media monitoring systems, we rely on technology to be successful—which is only going to increase. Let’s face it. Data—big data, that is—has taken over the marketing department—despite the questionable quality of stuff that inevitably finds its way into executive’s hands along with the good stuff. To make smarter decisions, we require more computing power and smart people to look at the data so we know exactly where to invest our precious marketing dollars. This is where a strong partnership with the CIO can help marketers decide on the right technology and methodology to collect data to make better business choices. If the CIO isn’t on your side, you won’t be able to execute the initiatives you want and at the scale you need. As a result, you will be forced to hire outside firms to run your software and data programs—an expensive solution that will only dilute the value of your programs and, perhaps, your department as a whole. When I was CMO of Intermec Technologies, the CIO, John Guevara, was my best friend. I respected his cautious and scientific approach to solving problems, and he appreciated my projects and measured expectations. George Thacker, CMO of Gerber Life Insurance Company, has worked hard during his 11 years in the position to establish and maintain a strong working relationship with his CIO. [caption id="attachment_26050" align="alignright" width="480"]Serving as "chicken" on marketing technology projects is one way for marketers to build a relationship with the CIO. Serving as "chicken" on marketing technology projects is one way for CMOs to build a relationship with the CIO.[/caption] “As part of a data-driven organization, my relationship with our CIO is mission critical,” Thacker said to me. “Knowing that I have the right technology and best data at hand gives me the confidence to make better business decisions that are not only good for me and the marketing department, but for the entire organization.” What made Thacker successful (besides time and hard work) in fostering this long-standing relationship? Below are five techniques he used to get the most out of the relationship:

1. Seek to Understand. Make sure to understand the constraints and possibilities of a joint initiative before setting it in motion. Doing so will ease any IT concerns that you will stuff an unrealistic project down their throats.

2. Be Intentional. Clarity is your friend when it comes to working with IT. The people in this circle all have mathematics-related degrees, so they appreciate precision. When scoping a project out, be as detailed and specific as you can so both teams are on the same page.

3. Understand Program Management. Knowing the CIO’s process—how IT gets stuff done—is invaluable. Not only will you appreciate the steps they go through, you will know how best to work within the process to ensure your needs receive priority.

4. Be the Chicken. This doesn’t mean you should be afraid of the CIO or that you should channel your inner fowl. The “chicken” is a nontechnical member of the development team who provides insight into the requirements of a project but doesn’t have a vote in how the project gets completed. This person’s only job is to be helpful without hindering.

5. Defend Them in a Gunfight. In any company there is bound to be a shootout between departments or executives. It’s the nature of corporate life. There is no better way to show your allegiance to your new CIO friend other than to have his or her back. Stand up for your CIO when it matters most to them and they’ll have your back when the time comes.

There’s no question you should be friends with everyone on your executive team, but befriending your CIO is critical for the next-generation CMO.    

Does Your Company Have an Accidental Brand?

$
0
0
Marketing exec Leo Levinson explains how companies often lose control of their brand and why it’s important to get it back. The word "brand" is one of the the hottest buzz words in marketing. Everyone talks about it, but unless you have actually defined and cultivated your company’s brand, you might actually have an accidental brand, something quite different from what you intend or envision.branding strategies What is an accidental brand? Firstly, let’s define what we mean by the word “brand” itself. My definition of a brand is "a promise to deliver a product or service on a consistent basis and then to become associated with that promise." Therefore, a brand is the essence of your corporate being, identified in terms that are relevant, attractive and compelling as seen through the market’s eyes. It is the essence of the company, and senior management must live its brand consistently through every function and activity. Many people mistakenly think that a brand simply means a logo, color or icon. Although these may symbolize the brand, they are not the brand itself. Others believe that a brand is big awareness made possible by big budget advertising. This misguided view is a main reason why smaller companies have accidental brands. They pay less attention to defining and living their brand, even though it’s important for them too. Smaller companies often believe that branding is just for the "big boys and girls" who have the big bucks to generate awareness. A brand is a promise and is valuable even when a smaller universe of people know about it. In fact, the world is full of business names people know, ones they pass by on the way to doing business with lesser known but more appealing companies. Still others believe that a brand is image. Many of these adherents reason that because image doesn't generate traffic or leads, spending effort on a brand is not good business. It's a warm and fuzzy luxury that they feel is a waste of time and resources. Although awareness and image are important components, they are far from being the brand. Every company has a brand, whether it sets out to identify one or not. A brand is most frequently the essence of the company as seen through the eyes of the market. In other words, the promises the company consistently makes that are most important to customers and to the market as a whole. That a firm decides not to pursue a brand strategy is no admission that it has no brand. It will have an accidental brand, and that accidental brand is probably not the promise that the company really wants to project. Many companies don’t even realize that they have an accidental brand, but they most likely do if:

• The brand is vague. It promises “simply the best.” But it doesn’t narrow its definition regarding its best areas and advantages, to what standards, compared to whom, in terms that are meaningful to the market.

• The company ignores the idea of a brand because it sees branding as unimportant. The company states, “We just make good food, darn it,” without recognizing that other companies in its industry do too. Customers will go to other companies that produce good food and promise marketing, distribution, customer service advantages and more.

• The promise is irrelevant. For example, if a company focuses on longevity and the fact that it’s 100 years old when the market is focused on superior customer service, the brand is irrelevant and will be accidentally redefined.

• The focus is on the wrong promise. For instance, the company promotes legendary customer service but the market wants the promise of quick, accurate service.

• Inconsistency in message or form. Diverse messages and images confuse the market, such that it will attribute its own concise accidental brand to the company.

• The company projects a low-quality image. Even if the company provides a truly superior product, if one’s website, packaging, customer service and sales staff appear to be lower quality or cheaper, the brand promise will be diminished.

• Staff is poorly trained. A company can have a superior product, but if only the C-suite projects smarts, your brand may be accidentally redefined as a dummy.

• The brand is untrue. If the company’s brand is about quality, but the company is focused on and commits its resources mostly to new acquisitions while quality lags or goes unsupervised, the brand promise will be accidentally redefined.

[caption id="attachment_26058" align="alignright" width="300"]Accidental branding in action PC (John Hodgman) and Mac (Justin Long) from Apple's "Get a Mac" advertising campaign. Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.[/caption] Competitors can also define the company’s promise. Sometimes it is a good thing. For example, if your brand promise can appear favorably next to that of a lesser competitor’s, you may find yourself with an accidentally superior brand. Conversely, your competitor can try to define your brand promise negatively for competitive reasons. For example, if your company defines itself as a cutting-edge technology company, your competitors might define you as a niche or nerdy company that is out of touch with the market (e.g., Apple versus Microsoft). Although a true brand is virtually always positive, an accidental brand can be positive or negative. This is a key reason a company wants to control its brand to keep the message positive and relevant. Every business has a brand, whether you're the one developing it or it is accidental. Take control of your promise to the market or you may discover you have a brand promise that you never intended.    

Cocktail Startup Marketing Kit and Caboodle

$
0
0
A Wharton entrepreneur toasts another alumnus' innovative startup growth strategy, involving a once-obscure cocktail ingredient and crowdfunding.In my previous post on the Wharton Blog Network, I explored the intricacies of the sharing economy in New York and came away with the idea to go undercover as a mixologist on Kitchensurfing.com. Since then, I have been seeking inspiration for my next wave of cocktail creations, especially as the summer comes into full swing. As I tested new recipes over the last few weeks, I became inspired by news of a new product and related Kickstarter campaign from my friend and fellow alumnus, Jomaree Pinkard, WG ’10, co-founder of Hella Bitter (HB). HB is a company that is taking one of the oldest ingredients in the history of cocktail making and infusing this otherwise stagnant niche product with all kinds of innovative growth strategies.    

Watch the pitch for the Hella Bitter “Craft Your Own Bitters Kit” Kickstarter campaign. (At time of publication, there are just nine days to go.)

  When Jomaree first told me about his involvement with HB back in 2011, my reaction was one of curious intrigue. “How will you sell enough bitters to make a big company out of it?” I asked. This is a product that craft bartenders use a few drops of in niche cocktails like the Old Fashioned or the Manhattan. My mom has had the same bottle of Angostura bitters in her fridge since I was a child. I knew something was different about HB when I was invited to the launch party in 2011 at a warehouse-like venue in Williamsburg, a hipster-inhabited part of Brooklyn. The party felt like an art installation within a massive underground speakeasy. Guests left with samples in little potion tubes that looked as if they came from the neighborhood apothecary in the 1920s. Needless to say, Hella Bitter immediately became the hot brand amidst the incredible rise of the craft cocktail movement that has transpired over the last few years. When I ran into Pinkard and his team at the Fancy Food Show last year, one of the largest food and beverage tradeshows in the world, their booth was overflowing with foot traffic. While their neighbors sat idly on stools allowing visitors to grab a sample with hardly an interaction, the HB team was corralling large groups with delicious cocktail samples paired with bitters-cured bacon slivers. I was astonished when Pinkard explained the latest growth strategy—a few drops go into every cocktail, but now they’re encouraging customers to use a few tablespoons to marinate meats; give a unique flavor to whipped cream; or as a mix-in with seltzer water for a delicious, low-calorie beverage. My mom’s going to need another bottle of HB every month or so. [caption id="attachment_26082" align="aligncenter" width="546"]The Hella Bitter team, with Jomaree Pinkard on the left. Photo credit: Hella Bitter. The Hella Bitter team, with Jomaree Pinkard on the left. Photo credit: Hella Bitter.[/caption] That was last year. Now HB is riding the latest wave in the consumer goods startup industry by attaching the product to engaging customer experiences: Don’t just buy the product but, rather, get a kit and make your own batch at home. Add your own ingredients to make yours unique and personalized to your preferences. The kit comes with those little apothecary tubes they had at the launch event and other tools that are going to make me feel like a 1920s pharmacist, preparing the finest elixirs for my friends or for my Kitchensurfing clients. It comes in an iconic box, which to me looks like the foreshadowing of a jump-onto-the-subscription-box trend. Looking for innovation in a bottle? I think we’ve found it.    

The Marketer’s Top C-Suite Ally

$
0
0
Marketing execs should cultivate the CFO, writes “the Fighting CMO.” It may be the most important part of their job. Previously, I wrote about marketing leaders aligning themselves with the chief information officer. That worked, didn’t it? Well, you can thank me later. (For the record, I’m a sucker for fruit baskets.) The road to chief marketing officer stardom doesn’t end at the CIO’s office, though. You should consider making another stop a few doors down (or boxes across on the organization’s flowchart) to talk to someone else who can help in making the journey a smooth one. That’s right, it’s time to make another new friend—the chief financial officer, or CFO.Marketers making allies in the C-suite. So, why should the lovable, well-liked CMO pair up with the by-the-books, by-the-numbers, budget-buzz-killing CFO? While it may seem like an unlikely duo, the CMO-CFO pairing could be a team for the ages, the Turner and Hooch or C-3PO and R2-D2 of the 21st century business world. Now, there’s a buddy movie I’d pay to see. But seriously, why the CFO? In a recent study by Active International, 77 percent of CMOs and 76 percent of CFOs indicated that the alignment between the two departments is important for business success. A Marketing 2020 survey showed that where the CMO’s department works closely with finance, more than 40 percent of respondents outperformed expectations. Thus, the CMO-CFO pairing is crucial. There are a lot of intricacies to having a relationship with the CFO. The CFO not only holds the purse strings, but also determines success or failure for any of your marketing efforts. In that regard, the CFO is the judge, the jury and the executioner. It’s paramount to remember that the CFO is a friend, not an enemy, and that the CFO is working for the greater good of the company, just like you, but from a different perspective. Let’s face it; our relationship with money is complicated. The CMO role is unique in that it requires both personnel and budget to execute the office, whereas most other departments only require one or the other. But that’s also the beauty of our job. What other position exists where you get to spend money? I mean, millions of dollars? Mark Zuckerberg’s personal shopper, maybe? U.S. senator, yes? With that spending power comes, yes, great responsibility. “Successful marketing is as much about disciplined budget management as it is about effective communications and customer engagement campaigns,” Jane Rodmyre Payfer, chief marketing officer of Ergotron, explained to me. “Establishing trust with the CFO, building a relationship with him/her, will mitigate, if not eliminate, the commonly held belief that marketing is the black hole of discretionary spending for the company. “ Since the CFO controls the budget, the CFO has a lot of sway in the executive boardroom, especially with the CEO. So, getting the CFO to understand your needs and objectives can go a long way in getting the tools and dollars you need to be successful. In fact, some would argue that it’s the most important part of our job. Editor’s note: Return next week for Part 2 of “The Marketer's Top C-Suite Ally," where Scott will share five ways to connect with a CFO.    

Harnessing YouTube Marketing Power

$
0
0
Communications pro and travel writer Lisa Niver explains why YouTube marketing requires persistence and a long-term commitment to the medium, and how to do it. When Junior Mapesone commented, “That's in front of my house in Manono,” on one of my first travel videos from Samoa, my first thought was, “Wow! Someone watched my video!” By the time I did my Monwya Night Market video and received the comment, “I miss my city,” I realized that I was helping people with my videos, in this case with remembering neighborhoods and family members who sometimes they could not visit.    

Connect with Lisa: Watch her Monwya Night Market video above.

  People were not only watching but also helping me in my travels. I received a correction on how to spell someone’s aunt’s name in Samoa and heard about the best ice cream parlor near a location in one of our videos. When I meet with clients about social media, we often talk about YouTube as the second largest search engine on the planet. Many people have concerns about and are intimidated by making videos. I highly recommend Lisa Lubin’s book, Video 101: Tips & Tricks for Awesome Visual Storytelling. Her tips are very practical, and she is an award-winning filmmaker with years of news and television experience. Tips from her book include:

• “Shoot and Move: Do move yourself and your camera when not filming.”

• “Vary your shots: Vary angles, and focal length. Get low. Get high.”

• “Let your camera do what we don’t normally do in real life: We don’t get too close to people (unless we are about to hug or kiss them). Let the camera invade personal space.”

Lubin’s No. 1 rule is to get sound. “Videos are nothing without great natural sound,” Lubin writes. “Too many people think of sound as secondary. It is not. It is just as important as good video.” Lubin’s shooting tips and editing tips tear sheets are full of helpful hints that you can bring with you on a shoot or into the editing room. Jason G. Miles’ series of books on social media have changed my strategies. His book Instagram Power assisted me in going from zero to over 1000 followers in three months. I found another of his books, YouTube Marketing Power: How to Use Video to Find More Prospects, Launch Your Products, and Reach a Massive Audience, full of ideas that you can easily take advantage of. Miles’ advice to tap into YouTube’s massive social network is: “Do something specific, consistent and excellent.” My experience matches one of his quotes: “Your videos are, in essence, a conversation with your viewers, so be authentic and engage your viewers. Even if you only end up with one subscriber, you may never know the difference you are making in that one individual’s life." I like his reminder that videography does not have to be hard work but simply a commitment to “publish more frequently. Have more conversations.” One of the most common mistakes he sees among business owners is that they undervalue YouTube as “a legitimate platform” and give up because they don’t see immediate results. “Making online content is a long-term investment and should be treated as such,” Miles writes. I agree with Miles that there is no “secret sauce,” but the dedication and effort to make great content that people want to share is worth it. Your videos can drive traffic and results for years. I have over 280 videos on my YouTube channel and 230,000 views. I started with a Flip video camera and 10 minutes of instruction from a fifth grader. Taking the first step is always the hardest part of any project.    

The Marketer’s Top C-Suite Ally: Pt. 2

$
0
0
Building a relationship with the CFO is a good idea for any CMO. “The Fighting CMO” offers five ways to do so.By now, I’ve convinced you that making the chief financial officer an ally is an important—if not the most important—part of a chief marketing officer’s job description. (If not, reread Part 1 of “The Marketer’s Top C-Suite Ally.”) To help you get the relationship started, here are five ways to befriend your CFO:How to communicate with the CFO 1. Take a “Finance For Non-Financial Managers” class. You wouldn’t go to Japan (or any non-English speaking country) without learning some basic words and phrases, would you?  It only makes sense, then, to learn the finance language before walking into the finance office. Being able to use the CFO’s language in discussions is key. Before you know it, you’ll know the difference between amortization and capitalization. 2. Talk financial impact when discussing program initiatives. Gone are the days when you can ask for “a couple million dollars” without promise of financial return. These days, you need to know exactly how much you’re spending and what impact it will have on revenue. Make sure you understand the financial trade-offs of your programs, and know exactly why you recommend this course of action. 3. Be flexible with your budget. Marketing is the easiest place to add and remove budget when it comes time for the quarterly earnings call. Be open to maintaining flexibility as it’s the best way to win the CFO’s favor. I usually try to keep as much as 25 percent of my budget flexible, meaning you’ll have to change your planning strategy. Trust me, it will be worth it. This way, if the CFO needs the budget to hit the quarterly number, then he/she can have it. 4. Know how to account for your expenses, understand the general ledger. Let’s say you’ve just spent $100,000. Does this money hit this month’s budget or is it spread across the next 12 months? Is the expense considered a cost of goods sold or is it below the gross margin line? The answers to these questions have a significant impact on how much money you can ask for and how receptive the CFO will be. Chances are you have a controller or bookkeeper assigned to your department. Befriend them, too. This person will be more than happy to teach you the ins and outs of the general ledger. I’ve stretched my budget by thousands—and even millions—of dollars by understanding the nuances of this process. You can as well, and your CFO will appreciate you more for this. 5. Save money when you can. Your new website project is under budget—no, you’re not dreaming. What do you do with the excess cash? Offer it back to the CFO. There’s a fear that if you give the budget back, you won’t get it again. First, that’s not necessarily true. Second, this is about proving that you’re a team player and fiscally responsible—not about establishing a fiefdom. Any flexibility in your department could help him do his job. By expressing your interest and appreciation for the big picture, you will quickly earn the CFO’s trust. I’m not going to lie; this is a long, hard road. But trust me, it will pay dividends. Following these five simple steps could potentially make your job a lot easier. For instance, you’ll find the budgeting process easier and greater support when accruing expenses. Heck, you may even find more budget to use for your experimental pet projects. In other words, you will find Nirvana awaiting them at the end of the journey. That’s all I have to say on this topic, but tell me what you think. Are there any strategies I forgot or ones you disagree with? Personal CMO-CFO buddy stories you want to share? Let us know below in the comments section, or email them to us. Editor’s note: Read David's explanation for why it’s crucial to connect with a CFO in Part 1 of “The Marketer's Top C-Suite Ally.”    

Not All Good Things Are Free

$
0
0
A SPOC online course teaches execs how to live long and prosper through marketing.A SPOC online course teaches execs how to live long and prosper through marketing. [caption id="attachment_26148" align="alignright" width="360"]Online college educations Art credit: Peter and Maria Hoey[/caption] Peter Fader has shared his revelatory research with many students, alumni and readers of his book, Customer Centricity: Focus on the Right Customers for Strategic Advantage. Are practitioners listening though? If so, are they understanding what they’re hearing? Or as Shilpa Patwardhan, connected learning director for Wharton Executive Education, puts it: “Customer centricity is fine as a concept, but if I were a CFO or CMO in a company, the question for me would be, ‘How do I actually implement this?’” Customer centricity involves identifying a business’ best customers, the tendencies that those customer segments share and what they might have in common with potential customers. It can help calculate “customer lifetime value,” a prized marketing metric—but in practice or just in theory? From March 3 through April 27, Fader, the Frances and Pei-Yuan Chia Professor and co-director of the Wharton Customer Analytics Initiative, answered that question for a group of nearly 50 executives participating in Wharton’s very first online-only Executive Education program, Strategic Value of Customer Relationships. The online platform developed by the Executive Education team may sound similar to MOOCs, the massive online open courses offered by such sites as Coursera, but Fader emphasizes that the Exec Ed program is more accurately characterized as a SPOC—a small private online course. Unlike a MOOC, a SPOC offers a tailored educational experience to a highly specialized audience. In addition to the rigorous course content appropriate only for experienced executives with decision-making responsibilities, Exec Ed has put special care into building the learning environment, particularly the community aspect. “We facilitate interaction among [the global participants] to make sure that the learning can be shared across study groups, just as we would if these executives were coming here to Philadelphia,” explains Maria Pitone, C’88, GED’98, Wharton Executive Education practice leader and director. Fader is particularly enthusiastic about this. He offered virtual office hours each week “to facilitate face-to-face—or at least camera-to-camera—interactions”— which is a notable deviation from the Coursera setup. “When I did my MOOC, I was actually talking to the camera as if it was my class,” recalls Fader. “That’s the beauty of a SPOC. I have this outlet to put things out there that are more provocative, and I can inquire a bit more and offer clarification.” Along with the intimate delivery methods, the small number of participants and careful program design allowed for the overall experience to embody the qualities for which Wharton Executive Education has become renowned. “Everything we say about our campus programs—high touch, active learning experiences—that’s exactly what they’ll have here,” Patwardhan notes. Here’s another important distinction from MOOCs: Course participants have gone through a screening process before they were allowed to enroll, ensuring that all students have the experience and decision-making responsibilities to guarantee a rich learning environment and peer dialogue. SPOC attendees spanned myriad professional sectors. Pharmaceutical executives and CEO s learned alongside seasoned marketing professionals. Fader often found himself working with participants from Bahrain, Australia,Switzerland, China and Mauritius, all at the same time. “It’s just amazing. It really is more than who they are—it’s where they are,what they do,” says Fader, who agrees that the course was enhanced by the select group of participants. Perhaps viewed as an experiment at first, a SPOC for paying customers has proved to be a delivery model with legs.Applications for Fader’s next Strategic Value of Customer Relationships cohort are being accepted on a rolling basis through Wharton Executive Education’s website. The eight-week course will run from September 29 through November 23. —Karen A. Boedecker

And in This Corner, ‘The Fighting CMO’

$
0
0
With the next generation of marketing already here, the time and place is now for honest dialogue about the discipline’s direction.With the next generation of marketing already here, the time and place is now for honest dialogue about the discipline’s direction. By David T. Scott [caption id="attachment_26164" align="alignright" width="352"]Mad Men Meet Modern Marketing Art credit: Stuart Briers[/caption]   When I enrolled in business school, and even later on when I first entered the marketing workforce, I had grand thoughts of being the next Don Draper, rising up the ranks of the marketing ladder and becoming a rock star CMO. Who doesn’t want to be a rock star, right? But I entered a very different world of marketing. Instead of sipping cocktails and dreaming up high-concept campaigns, I was tasked with execution-oriented marketing jobs, such as creating the next piece of sales collateral or crafting a nurture email campaign. While it wasn’t bad—you have to start somewhere—it wasn’t the post-grad life of building brands I dreamed of. Sure, the harder I worked, the quicker I rose. Yet at the top, I faced a new set of challenges. Instead of high-profile brainstorming sessions, I dealt with corporate politics, egos, budget constraints and the full gamut of upper management malaise. At times I felt as though my dreams couldn’t be further away. The reality for me—and no offense to those of you who are striving for marketing degrees or MBAs or just joining the workforce—is that business school didn’t prepare me as well as I had thought (or hoped) for the fierce new world of marketing. Don’t worry, it’s not the professors’ fault, and it’s not the University’s fault. Modern-day marketing just isn’t as sexy as it’s taught in the classroom or Mad Men glorious as seen on TV. It’s a little ugly and can seem downright dirty when you feel like you spend more time battling in the budget trenches than dreaming up the next Super Bowl ad. Today’s marketing is all about execution, execution, execution. So far in my career, no one has ever asked for my opinion on the brand logo or the type of font used for our corporate name. This is partly due to the fact that my superiors are too concerned with hitting the revenue numbers in the coming quarter. That’s right, ladies and gents, it’s not about the curvature of the “e” in your brand’s name; business is about revenue, profitability and shareholder value. Period. Furthermore, it’s driven by the company executives’ “what have you done for me lately” culture. I thought this urgency would change with a company’s size, but it really doesn’t. Regardless of how big or small, new or old the company is, elements within always push you forward. In startups, for instance, you’re worried about how much marketing you can do before running out of budget. In larger enterprises, you’re worried about how much marketing you can do before you hit the end of the quarter. Hopefully, I’m not scaring or dissuading anyone from following their business aspirations or marketing dreams. Trust me, that is not my purpose here. If I didn’t truly love what I do, I would not continue along my chosen path. I’m just trying to shed some light on the realities and challenges that business and marketing leaders face. Business school may not have preached all of the necessities and nuances, or prepared me fully for the down-and-dirty world (the real world) of marketing. This amazing educational foundation, however, did instill in me the knowledge and ability to learn on the job, excel at my work and become a thought leader in the marketing space. I often think back at my Organizational Behavior class, where I learned about the inner dynamics of groups—how to work with the different personalities on a team and still be productive. I continue to use the skills Professor Stuart Diamond taught me in my negotiating class to ensure I don’t get into a “winner’s curse” scenario by putting out the first offer. And my Problems in Financial Accounting course taught me how to read beyond the numbers to see what’s really going on inside a company. Then there was the marketing department. Guys like Len Lodish, now Samuel R. Harrell Emeritus Professor, who actually taught me cutting-edge brand marketing so I could walk the talk and learn the secret handshake to get a job in the first place. And Peter Fader—Frances and Pei-Yuan Chia Professor and co-director of the Wharton Customer Analytics Initiative—who believes marketing should not be viewed as a “soft” discipline. They are breathing new life into an old curriculum by crafting classes that dig deftly into the reality of marketing to train students on the tactical aspects of marketing. For instance, I had the opportunity to guest lecture in Fader’s Marketing 775 last year, during which I taught practical principles of lead generationand customer acquisition to his students, many of whomexperienced some of this in their previous jobs. These are the classes and the instructors who helped reinforcewhat I love about marketing. I love that marketing—real marketing—is about amplifying thetruth about the company and products, which is a good thingand allows me to get as close as I can to the customer withoutactually having to sell him something. Marketing right nowis a pretty thrilling place to be—a beautiful blend of creativityand mathematics, a meshing of qualitative and quantitativeapproaches. It is challenging and exciting and caters to the needsof both traditional and modern marketing approaches. With the next generation of marketing already here, I believethere ought to be a time and place for honest dialogue about thediscipline’s direction. The time is now, and the place is the Wharton Magazine website, where I’m launching a regular blog series called “The Fighting CMO.” My posts will give you the opportunity to step out of the classroom andinto the boardroom. We will discuss the weighty,daily issues facing today’s marketing executives—the stuff they don’t teach you in school and,essentially, the real-life experiences of someone who has workedhis way up through million- and billion-dollar organizations toreach the level of chief marketing officer. Topics (among others)will include: • How to win a budget gunfight. • New rules of lead generation. • Is social media worth the effort? • How to choose your next marketing gig. I look forward to jumping into this discourse within the Wharton community. I am happy to start discussion now. If you already agree or disagree with me, or have a topic to request for “The Fighting CMO,” reach me at magazine@wharton.upenn.edu. Good luck on your journey to be a successful marketing executive in the meantime. And keep fighting! David T. Scott, WG’98, is the author of The New Rules of Leader Generation, published by AMACOM in 2013. He has over 15 years of experience, serving as a top-tier marketing executive for Fortune 500 companies and VC-backed startups. He possesses years of firsthand experience as head of marketing for ForeSee, PeopleSoft and Intermec, as well as in positions for AT&T Wireless, Boston Consulting Group and General Electric. Learn more about David T. Scott at www.scottonmarketing.com.

Connect with us: Read “The Fighting CMO” on the Wharton Blog Network at http://whr.tn/fighting-cmo.

   

Student Sings Praises of MOOC’s Real-World Benefit

$
0
0
A change communications strategist writes about her experience with Coursera’s “Intro to Marketing” course.On occasion, we allow a guest blogger or two to share relevant insights. In this instance, I’m turning over my blog to LouAnn Buhrows, a Toronto-based communications strategist and writer whose career has focused on supporting change initiatives in the public and private sectors. Buhrows wrote me to relate how her experience with the Wharton Foundation Series on Coursera “was hands-down the best professional development I’ve ever had, and much of the content has been readily transferrable to what I do as a corporate change communications strategist.” Below is an excerpt from an essay Buhrows wrote describing her experience:MOOC education   There is nothing subtle about an exclamation mark. It sings and shouts. It anchors and amplifies. Whatever the sentiment, expression with an exclamation mark is never shy. When effecting organizational change, the goal is to build to that point of change! when people heed the boarding call with positive intention, behavior and action. The emphatic exists not only at the end of the journey, but at points along the way when ideas and solutions are generated and milestones achieved. Nevertheless, much of the change process occurs through subtlety, nuance and incremental brick-by-brick construction of plans and perspectives. And along the way, there will be bumps in the road; in my many years as a change communications strategist, I’ve learned that it’s a certainty. As such, I’m always on the lookout for professional development that will help me to mitigate issues and smooth things over. Imagine how delighted I was to learn of the Wharton School’s inaugural offering of “An Introduction to Marketing” via massive open online course (MOOC) format, taught by professors Peter Fader, Barbara Kahn and David Bell. This course, which is part of the Wharton Foundation Series on Coursera, was the perfect complement to my on-the-job experience to date. While I was familiar with many of the marketing concepts covered in the curriculum, it provided me with new thinking and fresh perspectives on old challenges. In particular, the exploration of experiential branding components, customer acquisition, social capital, and network and community affects is of tremendous value in helping me to develop better content with better tactical positioning. In marketing and change management alike, you’re looking to influence thinking and incent behavior, whether it’s about buying or buying in. It all comes down to knowing the intricacies of your target audience and the end-state branding that will inspire ambassadors to act. Transparency and authenticity are the two fundamental aspects of a change strategy brand mantra. People need to believe in the change – its purpose and meaning – and leaders must live it along with them. Leaders must also believe in what their own people can bring to the process and be inclusive of them. The influence of colleague-to-colleague and group-to-group networks cannot be underestimated, either. If there were a way to access the flurry of personal texts after a left-field unintelligible corporate memo, it would no doubt yield dizzying amounts of data on actual sentiment.    

Connect with us: Coursera’s next offering of “An Introduction of Marketing”—again taught by Peter Fader, Barbara Kahn and David Bell, Wharton's Frances and Pei-Yuan Chia Professor, Patty and Jay H. Baker Professor, and Xinmei Zhang and Yongge Dai Professor, respectively—begins on Oct. 14. Find more information on the Coursera website, and in the video above.

  Regular communications in clear, plain language take away the guess work for everyone by allowing people to relate at a more personal level and to internalize organizational priorities. The visioning messages that kick off a change strategy evolve into a narrative that encourages two-way dialogue, celebrates milestones and resolves emerging issues. Content should inspire focus and fortitude and become less aspirational over time as concrete outcomes are realized. Mix up the media to keep it engaging, but always recognize the effort and progress to date, the people who've been on the journey, and what's still to come. I always knew that marketing had an inherent role in change communications, but applying what I’d learned in the course inspired me to muse about what I think is the winning formula for corporate change initiatives:  a (authenticity) + b (belief) = c! (change). The ROI is all about people. LouAnn Buhrows —LouAnn Buhrows LouAnn Buhrows is a Toronto-based communication strategist and writer whose career has focused on supporting change initiatives in the public and private sectors. She was a participant in Wharton’s “An Introduction to Marketing” via MOOC format. She holds a B.A. in English Literature from the University of Waterloo and an M.A. in Criminology from the University of Toronto.    

Build Branding for Millennials One Employee at a Time

$
0
0
To create meaningful relationships with millennial consumers, brands must first win over their millennial employees, writes branding expert Jeff Fromm.It looks like marketers are starting to catch on. If you go to YouTube or AdWeek, you will see some of the most popular campaigns are ones that are asking their millennial audience for input in creating content and conversations around their brands. But millennials have the resources to easily see when brands aren’t truthfully walking the walk. In order for brands to create meaningful relationships with millennial consumers, they must first win over their millennial employees.managing millennial employees We often talk about the importance millennials have in influencing others with similar purchase habits. These “Millennial Mindset Consumers” are influenced by millennials’ every day choices. Who do you think taught that 50-year-old woman how to use her phone to pay for her drink at Starbucks? Likewise, many companies and HR departments are changing everything from benefits to company culture. You might even know someone who goes into the office at 10 a.m. in sweats, gets free beer, and rides a four-story slide to the conference room. While some of these perks are extravagant, the idea remains the same: When your millennial employees show love for your brand, they become your strongest brand advocates. The key factors that drive profitable modern brands also inform the thinking of companies trying to engage their millennial employees. Let’s take a look at a few. 1. Embrace the participation economy. Just as we have reimagined the definition of a brand value by adding participative benefits, we can now see the same can be said for the value in the workplace. It is no longer good enough to be able to work for a company and receive a salary (functional need) and enjoy what you do (emotional need). Brands must now allow their employees to help co-create everything from the culture to opportunities to give back. Allowing your employees to help build your brand not only creates an environment for them to excel, it builds trust. Remember a few years ago when Domino’s Pizza tasted like cardboard? They decided to listen to their audience and fixed the problem. Their CEO publically admitted that they had made a mistake in neglecting the quality of their pizza and then promised change. Not only did the consumers appreciate the change, the employees did, too. 2. Create experiences and adventures. When it comes to creating experiences and adventures for your employees, don’t overthink it. Google is one of the most loved brands by millennial consumers and also the company millennials want to work for most. The fact that Google tops both of these lists is no coincidence. Millennials appreciate the fact that Google provides employees with all sorts of experiences—from creating top-notch facilities and hosting unique company events to providing seminars and education opportunities outside of the office. You don’t have to throw a parade to create experiences that will make a difference in your employees’ lives, so start small and they’ll notice your efforts. 3. Stand for more than your bottom line. Finally, millennials love standing behind something they truly care about. A company can make a huge difference when it inspires its employees to stand for something bigger than the products or services sold. By providing this inspiration, companies can not only improve their company as a whole, but also improve their workplace culture for their Millennial Mindset Employees. So the next time you assume all millennials are sitting on the couch in their moms’ basements, you might instead look at ways to embrace your millennial employees, ask them to help foster your culture and ideas, and create a space where they can help your company excel. Because if not, you might find that your greatest brand ambassadors are leaving for another company. Editor’s note: Brendan Shaughnessy, a millennial account coordinator at FutureCast and a social contributor at MillennialMarketing.com, contributed to this post.    

Five Ways to Measure Your Lead Generation Budget

$
0
0
Chief marketing officer David T. Scott takes the guesswork out of customer acquisition costs, marketing budgets and driving associated revenue.Is your lead generation budget big enough? Probably not. But then again, I’ve never met chief marketing officers (CMO) who’ve felt they had enough dollars to do all of the things they wanted. But is your lead-generation budget competitive? Ahhh, well, this is a completely different question, and the answer may surprise you. As it turns out, companies are all over the map when trying to answer this question. A popular way to do so is to calculate marketing costs as a percent of sales. According to the Marketing Leadership Council, most B2B companies have a marketing budget that averages between 6 and 10 percent of gross sales. Manufacturing companies may be much less (between 2 and 6 percent), while aggressive, growth oriented companies may spend much more (between 10 and 25 percent). While these numbers are only benchmarks, assessing marketing costs as a percent of sales is a valid top-down approach. But there are other ways as well.measuring marketing budgets You could break from the pack and employ a bottom-up approach using a customer lifetime value (LTV) calculation—the dollar value of a customer relationship. LTV is not a new approach by any means, but it is becoming more popular today due to the emergence of new analytics tools. If using the LTV is the path you’d like to take, here are the five stages you’ll need to figure it all out: 1. Determine your customer’s lifetime value For example, say that the average contract is  a one-year agreement and the average fee is $20,000, then your annual LTV, or ALTV, would be $240,000. If you think customers will sign up for more than one year, then you can calculate a full LTV. For instance, if your customers have a three-year lifespan, you can assume your LTV is $920,000 per customer. However you come to this number, it will need to be agreed upon by key stakeholders in the business (i.e., your finance team, or the board if you’re a startup). 2. Determine the CAC Growth-oriented companies would argue that you can justify spending the full ALTV to acquire a customer if you’re confident you can keep the customer beyond the first year. Most companies aren’t and instead use the 20 percent rule. So if your LTV is $240,000, then your customer acquisition costs (CAC) would be $48,000. Or ... you can just trust your gut.  For one company I consult for, I immediately felt that a one-month CAC would work. One month of revenue is a reasonable amount to be successful with an optimized marketing program. For other companies, an entire year’s revenue is a good CAC budget—such was the case when I worked at AT&T. 3. Build the CAC model So what costs goes into the CAC? It can include things such as marketing employee expenses, marketing program expenses, sales employee expenses and even allocated overhead. I usually only consider the direct marketing dollars because its the cleanest way to measure expenses and determine lead attribution. 4. Calculate your cost per won deal (CPWD) After campaigns begin, you’ll need to calculate your CPWD— the actual cost to acquire your customer. Luckily, this is a straightforward calculation. If you’re tracking your marketing expenses, you should know how much you spent to win the deal. The bigger question is whether that number is over or under your target CAC. You can’t improve what you don’t measure, so measuring this number is a great start. 5. Develop a strategy to bring CPWD and CAC together When you compare the CPWD to the CAC, you’ll typically see a difference. Your goal is to find a way to bring these numbers together. There are several ways to make this happen, but here are two approaches to consider:

• Shift the budget to your best performing tactics. Some tactics will underperform and others will overperform. By shifting budget to the overperforming tactics, you’ll increase your efficiency.

• Get a volume discount. Increasing your volume is a great way to negotiate lowering your costs. For example, if you are paying a $40 cost per thousand impressions (CPM) at the current budget, then negotiate a $20 CPM at a larger budget. Most companies would jump at the chance to generate more revenue.

When following these five steps, you will inevitably need to add a few assumptions. The concern is that these “guesses” will make your calculations wrong. None of these calculations are wrong, they just require consensus on the assumptions that they are built upon. As you learn more, your can adjust your assumptions accordingly. So what does this have to do with determining if you have the right budget? Well, it’s simple. After you determine what it takes to acquire a customer, you can scale your budget based on how many customers you want to acquire. If your goal is to acquire one hundred new clients within the budget cycle, and your target CAC is $48,000, then your budget should be $4.8 million. While this may be a lot, remember that this will drive $24 million in associated revenue. A big win, right? Hopefully, I’ve given you a few things to think about regarding your lead generation budget. Now lets hear your thoughts.    

Decoding Social Media Data

$
0
0
Social media metrics often don’t align with a brand manager’s offline intelligence. Why? And how can businesses best analyze the data? Prof. Wendy Moe explains.Yes, social media has changed how we interact with our friends and with brands. We post pictures of our experiences to share. We rave or rant about a recent service experience. No one argues that social media has not changed the landscape of our social lives. But the question that companies are trying to answer is: How should social media change our business practices.social media data Some organizations treat social media strictly as a communications vehicle. They use social media as another outlet to push out messages or as a customer service hotline. But social media has the potential to do much more. With all of the data that social media generates, other companies are turning to social media as a source of customer intelligence, treating posts as valuable insights into the voice of the customer. This sounds great, right? Social media will be the solution to all of our business challenges, helping us measure customer satisfaction, respond to complaints and design better products based on customer opinions. So what’s the problem? First, there’s more data than many of us know what to do with. In my opinion, even the leading social media monitoring platforms are struggling with this. Second, often what social media metrics tell us don’t align with our offline intelligence. In a recent study published in the Journal of Marketing Research, a colleague and I showed that popular metrics of social media sentiment were not at all correlated with traditional offline brand tracking surveys. For a brand manager who has used tracking surveys for years, this lack of correlation casts serious doubt on the validity of social media as a source of intelligence.  

Watch Prof. Wendy Moe describe a new social media measure of brand health that strongly correlates with offline brand tracking surveys, during a presentation at the Marketing Science Institute.

  So what’s causing the discrepancies between offline surveys and online social media?

• Opinions expressed don’t necessarily reflect majority opinion. There are significant biases in the opinions that people choose to share on social media. People with extreme opinions are more vocal than people with more moderate opinions. People with negative opinions also try to dominate the conversation. And what do the majority in the middle do, those individuals who make up the bulk of our customer base? They tend to stay silent. This selection effect is one that survey design experts go to great pains to control, but we do little to control for these biases in our social media metrics.

• Opinions systematically differ across venues. Opinions on microblogs like Twitter tend to be more positive. Opinions posted to discussion forums tend to be more negative and exhibit a negative trend. Blogs provide more moderate or mixed opinions. However, few metrics explicitly acknowledge these differences. Instead, we average across venues, or we choose to monitor or give more weight to opinions expressed on one venue over another. Either way, we end up with metrics that don’t necessarily reflect the majority opinion of our customers.

What’s the solution? There are three:

1. Minimize the bias. When we encourage a larger variety of opinions, even if some of those opinions are negative, the dynamic that tends toward bias on online opinions is minimized. Plus, the impact of any one negative opinion is reduced as other voices balance it out. Rather than inviting only your best customers to post an opinion online, encourage everyone to post. It cultivates a more vibrant conversation around your brand.

2. Control for the bias. We will never be able to eliminate some bias, but we can account for it in our metrics. We can do this by examining how expressed sentiment varies depending on the product attribute being discussed or on the venue to which the opinion is posted. Understanding the sources of variance helps separate bias from true underlying opinion. Models that can explicitly measure the effects of these biases on expressed opinion will then be able to provide an unbiased measure of underlying customer opinion.

3. Cast a wide net. We can account for venue bias by monitoring a wider variety of venues and explicitly acknowledging the differences across venues. When we monitor only one venue, our metrics will be biased depending on what types of opinions and dynamics that venue attracts. But if we monitor a wider variety of venues, we can see the variation in opinion across venues and try and isolate average opinion, independent of the venue.

In the recent study published in the Journal of Marketing Research, my co-author and I did exactly that. We measured the effects of each of the biasing factors (including venue effects) on expressed opinion to separate bias from underlying opinion. The resulting measure of underlying opinion was highly correlated with offline brand tracking surveys. In other words, tremendous potential exists in social media data to serve as a source of intelligence, but only if we analyze the data carefully.    

P&G’s Brand Cull: Wise Move or Tragic Mistake?

$
0
0
Wharton Marketing Professor Peter Fader posits P&G’s divestiture of 100 brands could start a “profitable-product death spiral.” What's a better alternative?Proctor & Gamble has been getting a lot of press after the recent announcement that the company is going to divest up to 100 brands in order to focus more closely on its core offerings. CEO Alan Lafley said the move would retain the approximately 80 brands that generate 95 percent of the profits, “reliably creat[ing] more value.” It’s a purely product-centric point of view: identify what is most profitable and cull the rest. And in the range of voices discussing this decidedly bold move, no one is questioning whether it is best for P&G to view its brand portfolio solely through a product-centric lens. That silence is interesting, considering that it could be a tragic mistake. [caption id="attachment_26385" align="aligncenter" width="688"]Some of what P&G considers to be its "leadership brands." Photo credit: P&G. Some of what P&G considers to be its "leadership brands." Photo credit: P&G.[/caption] In fact, it could represent the early stages of what’s been termed a “profitable-product death spiral.” The idea originates from Driving Customer Equity, a book that I use in my online Wharton Executive Education program, Strategic Value of Customer Relationships. Authors Roland Rust, Valarie Zeithaml and Kay Lemon provide a detailed example of a grocery retailer that cut some products because they weren’t profitable. As a result, the retailer lost some valuable customers who liked those products. That, in turn, caused demand for other products to decrease, so those were cut, resulting in more lost customers.  This downward spiral continued until the retailer went out of business. While P&G might argue the retail example doesn’t apply to manufacturing, the parallels are striking, and it’s a lesson the company needs to consider carefully. P&G seems poised to make the same kind of attractive, short-term decisions that can become incredibly damaging in the long run. [caption id="attachment_26384" align="alignright" width="230"]Alan "A.G." Lafley, chairman of the board, president and CEO, P&G Alan "A.G." Lafley, chairman of the board, president and CEO, P&G[/caption] It’s also interesting to note that the product-centric logic behind the impending brand cuts is not the logic manufacturers like P&G use when they’re trying to get retailers to stock their products. They often tell retailers some version of, “We just did a market basket analysis and found that consumers who buy product X tend to be the most profitable consumers for you.” In contrast, however, there’s no evidence that manufacturers use that same logic to decide which products to get rid of. The inconsistency in their approach to selling versus dropping products is remarkable. So what should P&G do? First, the company needs to recognize that it is operating under the faulty assumption that products generate profits. In reality, profits come from long-term customer relationships, and products work together to build and strengthen those relationships. Instead of focusing on its most profitable products, P&G should be looking at its most profitable customers—and ensuring that product-pruning decisions don’t impact these customers very much. A lot of people are seeing P&G’s move as one of desperation—it seems to indicate that the company is in serious trouble. But it’s actually something companies should do more routinely—as long as they’re using the right criteria to make this kind of decision. Some of the products P&G will cut could very well be genuine “loss leaders,” but if they help to attract and retain the right consumers, they might have enormous value despite the lack of profitability they might have on their own. That’s value that P&G doesn’t seem to fully recognize, and thus it risks losing it—and much more in the long run.    

Why SEM Is Better for Lead Generation Than SEO

$
0
0
Search engine marketing may be better than search engine optimization. “The Fighting CMO” explains why. Many people think search engine optimization (SEO) is the key to attracting customers to your website. The goal of SEO is to convince the search engines—the algorithms that index all websites—that your webpage is the most relevant one for a given searched keyword. However, search engine marketing (SEM)—placing ads that appear above search results—is more accountable because sites like Google offer in-depth data about the performance of your ads. If SEM isn’t already in your menu of marketing tactics, you should consider making it a part of future campaigns. Here’s why: search engine marketing The Unpredictability of SEO I don’t recommend search engine optimization for lead generation because its primary function is to increase your site’s ranking in “natural search” results. This means it is very unreliable because the placement of your website is largely out of your control. You can work on SEO for months, and your site may still not get the “natural search” traffic that you want. Search engines like Google constantly change their algorithms so that search results can’t be fixed or manipulated by savvy marketers. This makes SEO a cat-and-mouse game that you can never be sure of winning. Search engine marketing, on the other hand, is more within your control because you’re choosing the keywords and paying for the ads. The Question of Attribution It’s very hard to quantify search engine optimization as a lead-generation tool because you can’t be sure how many leads actually came from your SEO efforts. Suppose someone visits your website and signs up as a lead. How do you tell whether that person found you on a search engine or visited your site after hearing about your company from a friend? Perhaps a combination of these factors led the person to visit your site. On the other hand, measuring the number of leads you get from SEM is more straightforward. A Second-Place Winner Search engine marketing is one of the few areas where finishing second place or even third place can be just as beneficial as finishing first. Say you have an ad on Google. After a week, your ad is consistently showing up in search results in second or third position when using the keywords you’ve chosen. If so, you may be compelled to spend extra money just to gain that top spot. The fact is, search engine users will often consider clicking on the second- or third-position ads just as seriously as they would consider the first-position ads. Why? May the Best Ad Win Often, an SEM ad works on the basis of how well it is written or how good the offer or call-to-action is to the potential customer. If you have a good ad or a great offer, you can often save money and still get a great result. Search engine marketing is one of the most flexible, scalable and cost-effective lead generation tactics. Although search engine optimization can be used for lead generation, you will get quicker results and generate more reliable leads using search marketing ads.    

Curalate: Wharton Startups to Watch Redux

$
0
0
Wharton Magazine reconnects with the co-founder of the Philadelphia startup Curalate, which seeks to help brands understand and succeed in the visual Web.For the last three years, Wharton Magazine has spotlighted a number of Wharton startups to watch in its winter issue. We decided to revisit our companies from the 2013 edition—“Startup Enterprise: The Next Generation”—and connected with three of them to see how they are faring and where they are headed. We’ve publishing our interviews with each as a series over the summer, and this week’s is with Curalate. Founded in 2011 by Apu Gupta, WG’05, and Nick Shiftan, the firm’s grown into a provider of a full suite of brand marketing and sales tools for the visual Web. Last we spoke with them, the Curalate team had 600 brands as clients and was named a top 50 new American company by Business Insider. The firm has far bigger numbers and feats in mind for the future, as you’ll read in the interview transcript below: [caption id="attachment_26430" align="aligncenter" width="650"]Apu Gupta, WG'05, co-founder of Curalate Apu Gupta, WG'05, co-founder of Curalate[/caption] WHARTON MAGAZINE: Where does Curalate stand now? APU GUPTA: Curalate continues to grow rapidly. In May 2014, we completed our Series B financing, raising $8.6 million. Curalate now has 50 employees and operates out of Philadelphia, New York and Seattle. Most recently, Curalate launched its newest product, Like2Buy, which makes Instagram shoppable. WM: Are you at a comfortable spot with Curalate? GUPTA: I don’t ever want to be comfortable with this. I am super happy with how the company is growing. ... There will be multibillion dollar companies based off of understanding pictures. WM: Have you had a moment when you realized you were prepared because of Wharton, or something you wish you would have learned more of at Wharton? GUPTA: I often think about, how does an MBA prepare you for being an entrepreneur? Does it prepare you? There are some things that don’t prepare you well—that make you more risk averse. The single most defining characteristic of a tech startup is growth. You’re growing something as fast as possible with little or no information, and you’re fundamentally disrupting the market. There are not a lot of comparables. I worried about analysis paralysis as a MBA. [caption id="attachment_26431" align="alignright" width="400"]The Curalate team The Curalate team[/caption] However, as Curalate has grown and has more data and a greater operating history, some of the fundamentals of my MBA are starting to become much more useful—things like finance and accounting, for instance. WM: What are the goals for 2014? GUPTA: Prove that it’s a truly scalable business. Once you do that, the path to becoming a multibillion business is in sight. WM: You say you aim to, “Prove that it’s a truly scalable business.” How do you actually go out and do that? GUPTA: To get to scalability, you have to get to repeatability. My focus right now is on running lots of small experiments that we can use to learn from. We want to get to a point where we can say, with reasonable confidence, that for a given input we can produce a given output. If we can get there, it's just a simple matter of adding more fuel in the tank and stepping on the gas. WM: What’s the next frontier for visual analytics? GUPTA: Curalate is enabling brands to drive engagement, traffic and revenue with the hundreds of millions of consumers that elect to communicate in pictures rather than words. The byproduct of our work is a data stream that is rich in consumer insights. We know, for example, not only what products people like but how they prefer to see those products. Social media signals this rich never existed before, and we believe these signals can be transformative to businesses. Now, you can make smarter decisions about what you buy, how you merchandise, what creative you display in ads and how you display content on your website. If we can get this data used by multiple parts of the organization, Curalate will truly change how social media is perceived by organizations. Editor’s note: Read our two other update interviews with innovative Wharton startup to watch: with Indian social enterprise Prajwalbharat and school loan provider CommonBond.  

Thinking Through Your Lead-Generation Management Strategy

$
0
0
New lead-generation initiatives demand testing and measurement. Don’t go in blind. The Fighting CMO writes on how to think through your strategy and set goals. Learning how to use lead-generation marketing to your advantage requires planning and forethought. You need to think through your management strategy before improving lead generation in your company. By setting goals, creating a plan to adopt new tactics and testing the results, you can measure how the company’s investment helps increase the number of leads and sales.lead generation strategy Developing a Management Strategy and Setting Goals Your goals should define how much you wish to increase your lead-generation efforts, by when and at what cost. It’s amazing how many organizations plunge into lead-generation campaigns with no idea of what they’re shooting for, how many leads they’re trying to bring in or what level of cost-effectiveness they need to observe. When their campaign is over, they have no idea how well specific tactics are working to provide them with the leads they need or even if their tactics have provided a positive return on marketing investment. Often, companies have gone over budget or have executed a campaign that has provided them with a minimal number of actionable leads. The goal for lead-generation marketing should be to use as many tactics as possible. In defining a management strategy, you should focus your goals on three areas:

1. Meeting or exceeding lead quotas

2. Using the best-quality lead-generation tactics for your organization—that is, focusing marketing efforts on the tactics that will give you the most high-quality leads to help meet lead quotas

3. Using the most cost-effective tactics for your organization

Adopting New Tactics If you wish to adopt new lead-generation tactics, you need to have a management plan in place for introducing them into your organization. You cannot simply switch to the new tactics and expect instant success. You first need to learn how to use them effectively. It may be that your current tactics work very well, but the new tactics can supplement them in generating leads. Or, maybe the new tactics will eventually be more efficient at providing quality leads than your existing leads. But be aware.  It will take a few tries with the new tactics to learn how to make them work to their full advantage. New lead-generation tactics can be expensive, so proceed carefully and systematically. Existing  lead-generation efforts need to be maintained; you don’t want to suddenly switch to new, untested tactics or divert essential marketing resources. This could cause a sudden drop-off in your incoming leads. The Power of Testing Without testing and measurement, you have no idea which lead-generation tactics work best or which tactics give you the highest number of quality leads at the most effective cost-per-lead. Nor do you know how to use those tactics in combination to obtain the maximum number of leads. I’ve seen companies pour large amounts of money into lead-generation tactics without having any way to measure their success or failure. Managers have no way of knowing if the $10,000 they’ve spent on the campaign has made a difference. When they want to justify the next $10,000 to their executives, they can’t. You need a plan in place to qualify and use the leads you acquire. Don’t take this step for granted, especially with new tactics. Even if you have a well-established lead-qualifying system in place, make sure your organization knows how to capitalize on the additional leads so that you get the maximum benefit from them. You don’t want to spend a lot of money acquiring leads with a new tactic and then have those leads slip through the cracks because your marketing or sales teams aren’t sure what to do with them. Through goal-setting, planning and testing, you can improve your lead generation efforts and justify areas where you need a bigger budget. Good managers and executives have learned how to predict results by explaining their plans and the potential benefits.    

Integrating Lead-Generation Marketing Campaigns

$
0
0
How to ensure that your lead-gen tactics result in the halo effect—or the marketing math of 1+1 = 3.486315073An integrated lead-generation marketing campaign is a campaign that uses two or more lead-generation tactics at once. I recommend that you use seven lead-generation tactics: email, search engine, social media marketing, banner advertising, direct mail, cold-calling and trade shows. If all seven tactics work for your business, try to use them all. If only four or five tactics are appropriate, use those. You can, of course, use lead-generation tactics individually and create separate marketing campaigns for each tactic, but what I love about integrated marketing campaigns is the halo effect. This occurs when the positive effect of one marketing tactic provides a performance boost for other marketing tactics. Time and again, marketers have proven that when it comes to marketing tactics, one plus one equals three, not two. The more you target your customers through different marketing media, the more you create an impression of your brand and company in customers’ minds, and the more inclined they are to consider your products or services. Another benefit of using your lead-generation tactics in an integrated campaign is that it allows you to plan and coordinate your  efforts around common themes and goals. To begin with, you can do all your upfront planning for the campaign in a single stroke. Once you determine your target audience and its demographics, you can coordinate tactics toward gaining leads from that audience. If you do an integrated campaign of multiple tactics, you can create a common message and build your creatives for each tactic around those themes. You can create one brief that each of your internal marketers can work from in developing collateral for each tactic. Or you can share this creative brief with agencies, consultants, interns and other participants, who can then do the work for you. If you use a series of tactics, you don’t necessarily have to spend equal budget, time and energy on each. You can spend the bulk of your time and money on a primary tactic that you know will work well for you, while devoting less to secondary tactics. You can even test one or two tactics against a baseline primary tactic to see how well the test tactics work. For example, say target customers read an article about one of your company’s vice presidents of sales in a trade magazine. A few days later, they see a display ad for your company on a website. A couple of weeks go by, and a customer gets a call from one of your salespeople. They remember seeing your company name in the article they read and in the display ad they saw online. So they listen to the salesperson and sign up as a lead. In this example, your use of several integrated tactics created a halo effect that added value to your lead-generation marketing campaign. At first glance, you might think your display ads didn’t work because the cold call captured the lead. But the display ads and the article about your executive caught the customers’ attention and helped to create an impression of your brand. When your salesperson called, this initial impression was enough to spark interest. If customers had not seen your display ads, they might have dismissed the sales call. When I combine multiple lead-generation tactics, I often see a measurable lift in overall performance. For instance, a search engine marketing (SEM) campaign may be humming along at a 2 percent click through rate. Then I do an email marketing push, sending out 50,000 emails. In addition to the traffic generated from the email campaign, I’ll also see at least a 50 percent increase in my SEM performance. People who received the email may not have clicked on it, but some will search for the company on Google and Bing to find out more about it. A percentage of those people will click on the search engine ad. You can also build momentum for your brand using nurturing campaigns. Using a “drip bucket” strategy, you keep sending emails to qualified leads over time, keeping them informed about special offers and company events. The more they see of your brand, the more they will take you seriously. Using a variety of lead-generation tactics in an integrated marketing campaign helps to accomplish this same goal, and integrated lead-generation marketing works as well, if not better, than nurture marketing.

Connect with us: Do you have a marketing topic to request for the next post from the “The Fighting CMO”? Let us know in an email to Wharton Magazine. Or read more about why Dave is in a "fighting" mood in his magazine essay, "And in This Corner, ‘The Fighting CMO.'"

 

Zylie the Bear’s Adventures in Crowdfunding

$
0
0
Wyn Lydecker talks with fellow alumna and entrepreneur Mary Beth Minton, WG ’82, about startup marketing and the nitty-gritty of Kickstarter crowdfunding.Startup marketing and crowdfunding from a Wharton entrepreneur.When it came time for Mary Beth Minton, WG ’82, to introduce herself at our monthly Wharton Alumni Fairchester Business Development Group a few years ago, she reached down into her tote bag and pulled out a stuffed bear. The bear was irresistible—18 inches high with moving joints, wearing carefully sewn clothes and carrying a bag. We had just met Zylie the Bear. Minton was starting on an entrepreneurial journey to produce and sell Zylie, along with a book describing Zylie’s adventures as she traveled the world. Then Minton pulled a panda bear out of her bag. Zylie was going to meet Shen the Panda on a trip to China. Shen was sporting a leather jacket and had a backpack. I was totally enchanted and entranced. Minton went on to explain that she was on a mission to unplug children’s play. For 20 years, she had been trying different ways to convince other parents to cut down their kids’ screen time. She finally realized hectoring wouldn’t work and instead put all that energy into creating a business to accomplish her personal goal. From observing her own children , she realized that some kids like to play with dolls and others like stuffed animals. She decided to design a stuffed bear that could move like a doll and wear doll clothes. Like the American Girl dolls, the bear would come with a complete character and storybook. Minton not only understands business from her Wharton education and a career in banking. She can also sew. She created her own prototype, worked with a puppet designer to get the bear’s face looking just right, then set out to find an overseas manufacturer and shipping agent. She bootstrapped the entire enterprise with the goal of selling the toys through retailers. I recently had a chance to catch up with Minton and hear about her latest experiences in building this entrepreneurial venture. When starting out, Minton talked to Wharton Entrepreneurship, and they told her, “You can have the best toy, but if no one knows about it, no one will buy it.” “We underestimated how hard it is to market,” Minton told me. “Most entrepreneurs make this mistake. Most are very creative. That’s the fun part. I talk to a lot of startups, and most business owners don’t know where their customers are coming from. You have to give your customers attention. You have to convince the buyers for stores to take your toy. But the customers have to want to buy it off the shelf.” She believes 90 percent of starting a business should be focused on marketing. Yet Minton did not have $20 million to buy ads on TV; her son, Matt McCarty, said they should use social media. He left his job in marketing in Denver, moved east and helped his mother market the teddy bears. Social media has played a huge role in connecting with an audience and building awareness and demand for the bears. “We have an avid fan base on Instagram of close to 10,000 (mostly kids) with very high engagement,” said Minton, adding that the toy’s Facebook page has 5,300 fans.  

Watch Mary Beth Minton’s TEDx talk, “Unplug to Play: Letting Kids Be Kids.”

  Getting the word out has not been the only challenge. The company also needed to work with a consultant to navigate the safety testing. “Taken together all the challenges of starting a business can seem daunting,” said Minton. “But once you start figuring things out, it becomes doable. It’s amazing how it all comes together.” The company has had five-fold year-over-year growth in sales, and the number of units sold is over 10,000. Minton has also given a TEDx Talk and has been invited to participate in a Women Business Leader Roundtable at the White House. Zylie and Shen have become so popular that fans are clamoring for the next bear in the lineup, Kiki the Koala. Minton and McCarty have just embarked on a Kickstarter Campaign to raise $125,000 to fund the production of the new toy. Asked how they came up with the Kickstarter goal, Minton explained that $125,000 will cover the costs of producing the minimum order, safety testing, inland freight in China, container shipping costs from China to the U.S., inland freight in the U.S., shipping costs to the end consumer and other operating costs for the five months from the end of the Kickstarter to final shipment. Add to those costs the time commitment. It took three months for Minton and McCarty to set up the Kickstarter campaign. They had to shoot a video and lay the groundwork for all the marketing and publicity to generate awareness and interest. They did prerelease publicity.  Again, Minton found that it’s up to the founders of a company to do the legwork when it comes to publicity and promotion. Even if they do not reach their funding goal (at last count, Kiki's campaign had 65 hours to go), the Kickstarter campaign has raised awareness of Zylie and her friends.  

Zylie the Bear is looking for a new friend—hence, the Kiki the Koala Kickstarter.

  “We’ve engaged with mommy bloggers and with members of the press. We’ve used Pinterest to share craft ideas for parents to do with their kids. And a popular YouTube family with 1.2 million daily viewers loves Zylie and Shen,” said Minton. All this has been great for sales and staying in touch with customers. “Ultimately, the child has to ask for the toy,” she noted. “We have to connect with the children.” Connecting with customers is every entrepreneur’s goal. It looks like Mary Beth Minton has been doing very well connecting with hers.    
Viewing all 141 articles
Browse latest View live